So I know this issue has been hammered into the ground, but I've found myself to be suddenly unsure. When Michael Vick was first charged with dog fighting it broke my heart. I'm a pit bull fan and to mistreat any dog, regardless of breed, is just wrong. Thankfully many pits from Vick's kennels were able to be rehabilitated and given great homes. Do I think what Vick did was wrong? YES, of course!! But where's the equal justice in this situation? Yes, what he did was wrong, but there are other players in the NFL that have committed crimes and served their time and they are now playing in the NFL. Vick has served his time and has also attempted to make amends with organizations such as the ASPCA and The Humane Society of the United States. I suppose what I'm trying to say is: if we're going to allow others who have committed crimes to return to play in the NFL, then why won't Vick be able to? Either allow all "badly behaved" players to play or none.
Vick has recently been allowed back in the NFL, but many teams are refusing to consider him as a member of their team. Is this because animal issues play at the heartstrings of America more than other crimes? Are teams worried that if they allow Vick to play for their team they will receive flack for it?
I'm interested in what will be the results of this issue and don't get me wrong, I hope he never plays in the NFL again and ends up working at a local 711.
I made a mistake in my last post when I said I was going to post a "Pup Du Jour" in each post. I suppose I should change this to "Pet Du Jour" since canines won't be the only critters I'll be posting.
I'd like you to meet Mollie ...

Mollie is at a rescue in Southern California called CARE (Cat and Canine Assistance, Referral and Education). The website doesn't specify her age but it does say that she's a senior citizen who's enjoying the important things in life. I think her one brown eye and one blue eye are so cute and unique.